http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/<FONT color=#000000>對信仰、婚姻、和死亡，都缺乏縱身一跳的勇氣。</FONT>吳典蓉zh-TW.Text Version 0.958.2004.214吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2009/03/11/383901.htmlWed, 11 Mar 2009 11:12:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2009/03/11/383901.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/383901.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2009/03/11/383901.html#Feedback7http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/383901.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/383901.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2009/02/07/373878.htmlSat, 07 Feb 2009 08:55:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2009/02/07/373878.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/373878.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2009/02/07/373878.html#Feedback9http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/373878.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/373878.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/12/23/362024.htmlMon, 22 Dec 2008 16:22:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/12/23/362024.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/362024.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/12/23/362024.html#Feedback4http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/362024.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/362024.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/11/09/345621.htmlSat, 08 Nov 2008 18:35:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/11/09/345621.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/345621.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/11/09/345621.html#Feedback49http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/345621.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/345621.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/10/27/339508.htmlSun, 26 Oct 2008 19:22:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/10/27/339508.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/339508.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/10/27/339508.html#Feedback44http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/339508.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/339508.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/09/01/317208.htmlSun, 31 Aug 2008 17:45:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/09/01/317208.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/317208.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/09/01/317208.html#Feedback17http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/317208.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/317208.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/08/16/310387.htmlSat, 16 Aug 2008 03:35:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/08/16/310387.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/310387.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/08/16/310387.html#Feedback72http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/310387.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/310387.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/07/27/302683.htmlSun, 27 Jul 2008 04:03:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/07/27/302683.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/302683.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/07/27/302683.html#Feedback10http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/302683.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/302683.html　這次，蝙蝠俠並沒有打敗大壞人-希斯萊傑飾演的小丑，真正讓小丑覺得無趣，是他設的一個賽局，完全不符他對人性的預期。囚犯難題，這次在電影中扮演關鍵角色。　　就像小丑所說，他從不計畫，因為隨機的製造混亂，才是恐懼的來源。　沒錯，如果說，理性計算所帶來的可預測性，是資本主義的基礎，混亂所造成的不可預測，確實是資本主義最大的敵人，因此，電影中，每個理性計算的人，例如在意名聲的]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/07/05/295542.htmlFri, 04 Jul 2008 19:28:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/07/05/295542.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/295542.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/07/05/295542.html#Feedback43http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/295542.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/295542.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/06/28/292930.htmlFri, 27 Jun 2008 18:15:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/06/28/292930.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/292930.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/06/28/292930.html#Feedback18http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/292930.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/292930.html　政治有時跟感情差不多，講得太白就沒意思了，在立法院打滾那麼多年，王金平難道不知道很少國家立法明定，國會議員可以事先參與對外談判。　他這番話是要說給馬英九聽的，「請尊重一下國會議長」，但說到這個地步，馬英九還不懂(還是裝作聽不懂)，難怪王金平要愈說愈氣。　有一點王金平說得沒錯，美國國會議員參與國際事務談判並非罕例，事實上，因為美國憲法明定，「總統經徵詢參議院之建議及同]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/05/22/280579.htmlWed, 21 May 2008 19:32:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/05/22/280579.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/280579.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/05/22/280579.html#Feedback32http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/280579.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/280579.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/04/19/270530.htmlFri, 18 Apr 2008 19:41:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/04/19/270530.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/270530.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/04/19/270530.html#Feedback57http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/270530.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/270530.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/04/02/265503.htmlWed, 02 Apr 2008 14:42:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/04/02/265503.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/265503.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/04/02/265503.html#Feedback53http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/265503.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/265503.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/01/13/235236.htmlSat, 12 Jan 2008 17:38:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/01/13/235236.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/235236.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2008/01/13/235236.html#Feedback96http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/235236.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/235236.html]]>吳典蓉http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2007/11/14/216981.htmlWed, 14 Nov 2007 14:37:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2007/11/14/216981.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/216981.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/archive/2007/11/14/216981.html#Feedback4http://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/comments/commentRss/216981.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/tess555/services/trackbacks/216981.html]]>