<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>生理人生</title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/</link><description>&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 新細明體; FONT-SIZE: 12pt" lang=ZH-TW&gt;&lt;FONT color=#ff0000&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;一位生理學家的讀書、思想及翻譯筆記&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description><managingEditor>潘震澤</managingEditor><language>zh-TW</language><generator>.Text Version 0.958.2004.214</generator><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[演化大勝利？]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2007/10/16/207490.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2007/10/16/207490.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/207490.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2007/10/16/207490.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>332</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/207490.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/207490.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 二○○五年底，「演化」又成為熱門的「新聞」。先是十二月中旬美國科學促進會出版的《科學》期刊，將「運作中的演化」選為年度十大科學突破之首；領先行星探測器、植物開花基因、中子星、以及與神經病變相關基因等發現。以問世將近一百五十年的學說而言，可是少見的殊榮。造成演化論得獎的理由，包括黑猩猩基因組完成定序、新種的產生機制，以及 1918 年流感病毒基因解碼等研究，都在 2005 年發表。再來，美國賓州地<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/207490.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[隨機才是天機 by 鄭文炫]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/11/02/445361.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/11/02/445361.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/445361.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/11/02/445361.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/445361.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/445361.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[拙作〈算命為什麼會準〉貼出後，網友回應中提及統計學的「隨機」概念。有謂：人類之所以迷信的原因在於誤解「隨機」的意義。有謂：人生猶如布朗運動（Brownian motion）。布朗運動是隨機的，過去、現在、未來各不相干。這是個有趣又有意思的議題，值得討論。我不揣愚陋，嘗試作文闡述之。如有任何不對，還望網友不吝指教，給我學習的機會，衷心感謝。知名的死亡學家Elisabeth Kubler-Ross在她<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/445361.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[對科學的共識]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/31/444843.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/31/444843.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/444843.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/31/444843.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/444843.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/444843.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[我的部落格經常出現有關科學的討論，但各說各話，徒增困擾。今後想要針對科學議題留言的網友，該有如下幾點基本共識： 一、廣義的科學包括一切有系統的知識，特指以發掘問題、收集資料、驗證假說等方法所建立的學問，並在同樣的條件下，經得起重覆驗證。二、狹義的科學指的是研究自然界的學問，簡稱自然科學，以物理、化學及生物等學門為基礎，天文、地理、醫學等學門為應用，與研究人類心理、行為、歷史與制度的社會科學有所區隔<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/444843.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[理盲濫情與專業傲慢]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/29/444423.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/29/444423.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/444423.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/29/444423.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/444423.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/444423.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 自從九月初在台客座的錢致榕教授說了一句「台灣社會從下到上都呈現出理盲而且濫情」之後，「理盲濫情」四字一時成為好用的熟語，國內的一切亂象似乎都可以由它解釋；除了拿來指責旁人外，還可以當成退休的理由。 事實上，「理未易明」，古有明訓；開創實驗醫學的法國生理學家伯納（Claude Bernard, 1813-1878）也說過：「人的天性是形而上且自大的，他會認為與自己感覺相對應的心靈完美創造，與現實是<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/444423.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[算命為什麼會準？by 鄭文炫]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/23/442952.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/23/442952.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/442952.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/23/442952.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/442952.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/442952.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[新任的吳閣揆據說愛算命，招來物議。其實愛算命的又何只他一人。所謂「卜以決疑」，人非生而知之，活在這個時時變化不居的世界裡，處處不解，乃至感到前途茫然，何舉何措，迷惘無主。人人心中都有或多或少的疑團待解，卻不知如何破疑解惑？好叫人趨吉避凶。而算命一業源遠流長，其原始作用就在幫人斷吉凶、決疑惑。所以，世人愛算命，也算「理所當然」了。然而，一些所謂「有識之士」提出異見，批評算命不足信，屬於迷信行為。到底<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/442952.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[蛋白質是什麼？]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/21/442555.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/21/442555.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/442555.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/21/442555.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/442555.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/442555.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[這也是蛋白質，那也是蛋白質，明明都是蛋白質，為什麼在性狀、顏色、機能上有那麼大差異？蛋白質由什麼組成？如何生成？其差異又由什麼決定？ 前文〈基因是什麼？〉已然提到，DNA 分子雖然攜帶了遺傳的資訊──基因，但 DNA 必須轉譯成蛋白質，才能發揮作用。DNA 當中的核苷酸鹼基序列，就決定了組成蛋白質的胺基酸序列。人類的基因組裡有兩萬到兩萬五千個基因，理論上每個基因負責了一個蛋白質的生成，但同屬一個基<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/442555.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[胡適中醫孫中山（註一）by 鄭文炫]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/18/441744.html</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/18/441744.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/441744.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/18/441744.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/441744.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/441744.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[潘教授為文談中醫無法科學化的困境，或者說，因無法科學化而陷入困境，兩者互為因果關係。篇末言：「至於中藥的療效，又是另外一個問題了。」此話饒有意味，使我想到歷史往事。孫中山罹患肝癌時，到當時亞洲設備最齊全的西式醫院——北京協和醫院——就診，但病症依然沉危。同志、家人不捨，力勸孫中山服中藥、看中醫。孫中山拒絕了。「他說，他本身是醫生，他知道現代醫藥束手無策時，中醫的確有時也能治好疑難的病症。」「一隻沒<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/441744.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[中醫的困境]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/15/441183.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/15/441183.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/441183.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/15/441183.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>21</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/441183.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/441183.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 中醫是傳統中國文化的一部分，給稱為國粹，又稱傳統醫學。然而與其他傳統文化相比，中醫的地位也是尷尬的，因為在現代醫學高聳殿堂的陰影下，中醫給人保守、落伍以及不科學的印象，甚至幾度瀕臨存亡絕續的關頭。 清末民初，中國給船堅炮利的西方列強壓得抬不起頭。為了救亡圖存，不得不引進民主與科學等西學，取代四書五經等舊學；同時，也一再有人提出「廢除中醫」之議。其主要論點，是說中醫理論接近哲學甚至玄學，並無科學根<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/441183.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[基因是什麼？]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/12/440397.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/12/440397.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/440397.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/12/440397.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/440397.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/440397.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[基因是什麼，它會做哪些事？基因突變是為了適應天擇？還是會加速人體毀滅呢？ 「基因」這個名詞，早已進入了一般人的常用字彙，譬如說某人遺傳了父（母）親的身高基因、某家族擁有長壽基因，或是某人帶有某種疾病基因等；報章雜誌也不時出現什麼肥胖基因、冒險基因，甚或偷情基因之類的報導。但基因究竟是什麼，一般人卻不一定說得清楚，更不用說曉得它所司何職了。 首先，基因是遺傳的單位，也就是攜帶了決定生物特徵（像是膚色<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/440397.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[生理之謎大募集]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/11/440284.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/11/440284.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/440284.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/11/440284.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/440284.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/440284.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 我接了個寫書的計畫，內容以一般人可能出現與身體有關的問題為主。除了我曾經寫過的一些「生之理」文章外，出版社編輯還幫忙收集了五十個問題（如附）。 我將問題做了簡單分類，可以看出以神經與感覺系統的問題最多，表皮系統居次，至於心血管及內分泌系統則不見一題，也可見一般人對於看不見、感覺不到的身體活動有所忽視。 我有近一年的時間完成這個計畫，今後會陸續貼出一些針對問題的回覆，還望網友不吝指正。在此也歡迎網<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/440284.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[大腸桿菌教我們的事──《小生命》書評]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/07/439211.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/07/439211.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/439211.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/07/439211.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/439211.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/439211.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[這是上周日中時開卷刊出的書評，由我的動物系學長及陽明老同事程樹德教授執筆。承蒙他應允，讓我把文章貼在這裡，特此致謝。大腸桿菌教我們的事──《小生命》書評程樹德（陽明大學微免所副教授）中國時報開卷　2009/10/04 科學文化是現代國家賴以生存的「軟」實力，沒它，就沒「硬」實力的技術。沒技術就捱打，這是古今不易的道理。500 年前，西班牙仗著鋼刀及槍炮戰馬，屠殺且消滅了印加及阿茲特克王國；170 <img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/439211.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[從細菌看生命──《小生命》導讀]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/06/438684.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/06/438684.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/438684.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/06/438684.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/438684.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/438684.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[我又有本譯書《小生命》出版了，離前一本《蛋白質殺手》只間隔一個月；那是由於兩家出版社作業速度不同造成的，事實上兩本書的譯稿完成時間，差了七個月左右。中時「開卷」部落格已於上週末貼出我為該書寫的導讀以及第一章內容，我也把導讀貼在這裡。《小生命：大腸桿菌解開生命奧祕》（Microcosm: E. Coli and the New Science of Life）卡爾•齊默（Carl Zimmer）著潘<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/438684.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[人人都是直覺生物學家]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/01/437868.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:45:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/01/437868.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/437868.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/10/01/437868.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>27</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/437868.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/437868.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 談到「生命」這個題目，一如道德，人人都有些意見；再怎麼說，生命是切身問題，每個人都可能思考自身存在的意義，從而發展出自己的想法。至於集體想法裡，宗教自然是大宗，其餘則是各種神話與民俗信仰；反之，根據生物學（時髦的名詞是「生命科學」）的世俗觀點，則少有人談及，這是筆者撰寫〈我們需要什麼樣的生命教育？〉的初衷。 有人以為該文攻擊了宗教，其實不然；我只是指出宗教裡對生命的看法對非信徒沒有幫助，如是而已<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/437868.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[我們需要什麼樣的生命教育？]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/18/435007.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/18/435007.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/435007.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/18/435007.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>17</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/435007.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/435007.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 每當新聞報導出現有年輕人自殺，或是科學家發明什麼操弄胚胎或基因的新方法時，就會有人跳出來說，我們應該重視生命教育。言下之意，是說有人輕忽或不尊重生命，因此需要生命教育的薰陶；換句話說，生命教育可以讓人認清生命的可貴，以及生命的神聖不可侵犯。 上述這種說法，與上位者看到社會出現亂象，而提出加強品德教育的呼籲一樣，容易落人口實，也都屬於吃力不討好之事。然而比起品德是否可教的根本爭議來，生命教育在這方<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/435007.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[智慧的老人？]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/15/434368.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/15/434368.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/434368.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/15/434368.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>16</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/434368.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/434368.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 家有一老，如有一寶。在人類平均壽命普遍不高的古代社會，能活到六、七十歲確是古來稀，也可想見其人必有特殊之處：不是天生異稟，就是時運過人，才能在艱苦的生活壓力下，存活下來。再者，經驗生智慧，經過好幾回天災人禍還能存活下來的人，就是要比從來沒經驗過的人更曉得如何應變。因此，傳統社會尊重老人，認為老人擁有智慧，其來有自。 然而在教育普及、資訊流通以及壽命普遍增長的現代，老人受到的尊重也就大不如前。一來<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/434368.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[知識的饗宴——《蛋白質殺手》譯後感]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/12/433592.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/12/433592.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/433592.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/12/433592.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/433592.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/433592.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[從網上看到，《蛋白質殺手》這本書終於出版了，在此貼出我的譯後感，算是為自己領養的作品打個廣告。《蛋白質殺手——狂牛病、致死性失眠症與普利子的糾葛之謎》（The Family That Couldn't Sleep）麥克斯（D. T. Max）著 潘震澤、楊宗宏 譯 天下文化 2009 讀書的方式，因人因書而異。我是那種喜歡一字一句從頭讀到尾、不習慣速讀略讀的人，因此書架上擺了一堆只讀了開頭幾頁就無<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/433592.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[學術成就與數字遊戲]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/08/432565.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/08/432565.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/432565.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/08/432565.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/432565.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/432565.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 「所謂大學者，非謂有大樓之謂也，有大師之謂也。」當過大陸及台灣清華大學校長的梅貽琦說過的這句話，很多人都耳熟能詳，也不會有太多異議；但何謂「大師」，只怕見仁見智，且今昔有所不同。 以往能被稱作大師者，總是在學術上有特殊成就，且著作等身、望重士林；如今則大師氾濫，各行各業都有人號稱大師，不獨學術界為然。再者，學術界分科愈細，某行的大師到了別行，可能藉藉無名。尤有甚者，在今日只看近五年研究成果的學術<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/432565.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[驚異大奇航]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/01/430898.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/01/430898.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/430898.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/09/01/430898.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/430898.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/430898.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 在《聯合縮小軍》推出後二十來年，好萊塢又拍過一部類似題材的電影《驚異大奇航》（Innerspace, 1987，注一）。同樣也是利用想像中的縮小技術，將一艘單人潛艇縮成細胞大小，送入人體。 這兩部電影的基本要素雖然相似，但有幾個重大的不同點。其中之一，是《驚異大奇航》裡的縮小潛艇，原本是要送入兔子體內進行試驗的，而非送入人體執行治療任務；但在意外的情況下，給送入了某個不知情的路人體內，笑點也因此<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/430898.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[從大學入學指考放榜談起]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/08/22/428309.html</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/08/22/428309.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/428309.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/08/22/428309.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/428309.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/428309.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[ 今年大學入學指定科目考試放榜，有兩個現象值得玩味：一是許多人選校不選系，造成台大一些較冷門科系的錄取成績高過清、交、成大的較熱門科系；另一是缺額人數再創新高，某些私立院校的分發人數甚至不到核定名額的10%。 老實說，選校不選系的風氣非自今日始，台大的光環在台灣已閃亮了不下一甲子，其他國立大學再怎麼努力、辦學再怎麼出色，也難以扭轉社會大眾獨鍾台大的眼神。多年前陽明有位同事開玩笑說，台灣就這麼丁點大<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/428309.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item><item><dc:creator>潘震澤</dc:creator><title><![CDATA[聯合縮小軍]]></title><link>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/08/18/426431.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/08/18/426431.html</guid><wfw:comment>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/426431.html</wfw:comment><comments>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/archive/2009/08/18/426431.html#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/comments/commentRss/426431.html</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/services/trackbacks/426431.html</trackback:ping><description><![CDATA[由於專欄篇幅限制，刊出時有所刪減，這裡貼的是完整的版本。 前些年奈米科技炒得火紅，連帶可能用於人體的微型機械也經常有人提及。想像中小如細菌的人造機械，在人體血液組織間游走，進行偵測修補等任務，可是科幻小說的情節。1966 年的好萊塢電影《聯合縮小軍》（Fantastic Voyage），演的就是這樣的故事（注一）。 該片是說美蘇冷戰期間，某位投誠的蘇俄科學家在引渡途中遭到襲擊，腦內出血昏迷。美國軍<img src ="http://122.147.50.100/jenntser/aggbug/426431.html" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></description></item></channel></rss>