http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/<SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 新細明體; FONT-SIZE: 12pt" lang=ZH-TW><FONT color=#ff0000><STRONG>一位生理學家的讀書、思想及翻譯筆記</STRONG></FONT></SPAN>潘震澤zh-TW.Text Version 0.958.2004.214潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2007/10/16/207490.htmlTue, 16 Oct 2007 01:44:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2007/10/16/207490.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/207490.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2007/10/16/207490.html#Feedback332http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/207490.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/207490.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/20/449525.htmlFri, 20 Nov 2009 03:27:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/20/449525.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/449525.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/20/449525.html#Feedback1http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/449525.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/449525.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/12/447747.htmlThu, 12 Nov 2009 04:56:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/12/447747.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/447747.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/12/447747.html#Feedback0http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/447747.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/447747.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/08/446906.htmlSun, 08 Nov 2009 02:12:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/08/446906.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/446906.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/08/446906.html#Feedback1http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/446906.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/446906.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/02/445361.htmlMon, 02 Nov 2009 13:40:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/02/445361.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/445361.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/11/02/445361.html#Feedback7http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/445361.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/445361.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/31/444843.htmlFri, 30 Oct 2009 18:45:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/31/444843.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/444843.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/31/444843.html#Feedback9http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/444843.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/444843.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/29/444423.htmlThu, 29 Oct 2009 01:59:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/29/444423.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/444423.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/29/444423.html#Feedback15http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/444423.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/444423.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/23/442952.htmlFri, 23 Oct 2009 00:02:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/23/442952.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/442952.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/23/442952.html#Feedback15http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/442952.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/442952.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/21/442555.htmlWed, 21 Oct 2009 04:25:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/21/442555.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/442555.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/21/442555.html#Feedback2http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/442555.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/442555.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/18/441744.htmlSat, 17 Oct 2009 17:34:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/18/441744.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/441744.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/18/441744.html#Feedback10http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/441744.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/441744.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/15/441183.htmlThu, 15 Oct 2009 04:57:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/15/441183.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/441183.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/15/441183.html#Feedback21http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/441183.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/441183.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/12/440397.htmlMon, 12 Oct 2009 04:06:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/12/440397.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/440397.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/12/440397.html#Feedback8http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/440397.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/440397.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/11/440284.htmlSun, 11 Oct 2009 14:07:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/11/440284.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/440284.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/11/440284.html#Feedback8http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/440284.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/440284.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/07/439211.htmlWed, 07 Oct 2009 15:25:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/07/439211.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/439211.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/07/439211.html#Feedback4http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/439211.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/439211.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/06/438684.htmlMon, 05 Oct 2009 16:32:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/06/438684.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/438684.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/06/438684.html#Feedback3http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/438684.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/438684.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/01/437868.htmlThu, 01 Oct 2009 12:45:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/01/437868.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/437868.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/10/01/437868.html#Feedback27http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/437868.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/437868.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/18/435007.htmlFri, 18 Sep 2009 13:34:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/18/435007.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/435007.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/18/435007.html#Feedback17http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/435007.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/435007.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/15/434368.htmlTue, 15 Sep 2009 11:43:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/15/434368.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/434368.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/15/434368.html#Feedback16http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/434368.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/434368.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/12/433592.htmlFri, 11 Sep 2009 17:55:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/12/433592.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/433592.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/12/433592.html#Feedback2http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/433592.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/433592.html]]>潘震澤http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/08/432565.htmlMon, 07 Sep 2009 16:14:00 GMThttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/08/432565.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/432565.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/archive/2009/09/08/432565.html#Feedback6http://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/comments/commentRss/432565.htmlhttp://blogger.chinatimes.com/jenntser/services/trackbacks/432565.html]]>